10th Nassau water district files suit against chemical manufacturers

Source: News 12 Long Island

10th Nassau water district files suit against chemical manufacturers

Posted: January 12, 2019
Originally Published: January 9, 2019

MANHASSET - The Manhasset-Lakeville Water District is the 10th in Nassau County to file a lawsuit against chemical manufacturers for polluting drinking wells with 1,4-dioxane, which is listed as a likely carcinogen.

Environmentalists say the chemical is found in manufacturing as a solvent and in many personal care products, including detergents, soaps, shampoos, cosmetics, and even baby wipes. But they say it's not listed as an ingredient because it's a byproduct.

"When we use it in the shower or bath tub or sink, it goes down into our underground water supply," says Adrienne Esposito, of Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

Esposito says if manufacturers are going to sell products that pollute groundwater, they should also pay to have it removed.

The law firm representing the water districts says defendants Dow Chemical, Ferro Corporation and Vulcan Materials "all knew or should have known that marketing, promoting, and selling products with 1,4-dioxane would put those people at risk. But they did it for decades, without warning anyone about the threats."

The highest detection of 1,4-dioxane was measured in a well in Hicksville. The Hicksville Water District filed a lawsuit in 2017 against Philips Electronics, which manufactured lights in the area for four decades.

Currently, New York state does not have drinking water standard for 1,4-dioxane, but a standard is expected to be set sometime this year.

Watch the video.

December Newsletter

Highlights and Happenings: December 2018

Help CCE build on our success, and support our campaigns to protect public health and the environment in NY and CT. Make a contribution today.  

Highlights

Working with CT Governor-Elect Lamont to Tackle Solid Waste and Recycling

Our Connecticut Program Director Louis Burch was invited by Governor-Elect Ned Lamont's transition team to participate in its environmental policy subcommittee. We are helping to identify and outline the new administration's top priorities regarding solid waste and recycling, including eliminating single-use plastics (e.g., bags), improving public education on recycling, expanding curbside food waste composting, and modernizing CT's Bottle Bill. The subcommittee unveiled its priority recommendations at a public meeting in December.

NYS Drinking Water Council Recommends Toughest Standards in the Nation for Emerging Contaminants!

The NYS Drinking Water Council has voted to set a standard of 1 ppb for 1,4-dioxane and 10 ppt for PFOS and PFOA. These will be the most rigorous drinking water standards in the nation for these harmful emerging contaminants. Long Island has the highest detected levels of 1,4-dioxane (a likely carcinogen) in the nation. PFOS and PFOA are also toxins that may cause cancer and have been detected at high levels in drinking water wells throughout NY. We look forward to NYS expeditiously adopting these stringent, enforceable standards to protect New Yorkers from harmful toxins and hopefully serve as a model for other states!  Happenings

Governor Cuomo Pledges to Make NY's Electricity 100% Carbon Neutral by 2040

We were thrilled to attend a press conference in December where Governor Cuomo announced a new goal to launch a "Green New Deal" and achieve zero carbon emissions in the electric sector by 2040. This effort builds on his 50% renewable energy by 2030 and offshore wind goals and presents a big opportunity to finally transition away from polluting fossil fuels and embrace renewable energy statewide. We look forward to learning more about the Green New Deal and fighting to advance good wind, solar, and other renewable projects.

Going Strawless for Sea Turtles

In December, we received a grant from Long Island Sound Futures Fund focused on preventing plastic pollution entering Long Island Sound. We'll be working in Nassau and Suffolk communities to educate the public on going strawless and conducting coastal cleanups, so stay tuned for more!

Central NY: Stay Warm This Winter with Geothermal!

We are an active member of the HeatSmart CNY campaign, which has been working to help CNY residents and businesses install modern, clean geothermal systems. HeatSmart CNY is a grassroots community initiative to support residents and businesses in exploring ways to improve the efficiency of their buildings, including air source, ground source, and hot water heat pump technologies. To learn more about geothermal technologies, join us at upcoming HeatSmart events. If you own a home or business in Cayuga, Cortland, Madison, Onondaga, or Oswego, you can sign up for a free, no obligation energy assessment!

Working to Ensure Affordable Drinking Water in the City of Buffalo

From 2010 to 2017, water costs increased 41 percent across the country as water shutoffs also increased. As we work to make investments in protecting drinking water, we are also working to ensure that water remains affordable, particularly to low-income residents. In December, CCE's Brian Smith testified at a City of Buffalo Water Board hearing calling for a robust water affordability program. We commend the Water Board for moving forward with a program to provide low-income residents with a credit to ensure that their water bills don't increase in the short term; however, we recognize that this is only a first step and more needs to be done to ensure that water rates remain affordable in the years to come.

Implementing the New York State Drug Take Back Act

In 2018—with your help—we passed the monumental NYS Drug Take Back Act, which will require the pharmaceutical industry to fund a robust, statewide drug take-back program to keep drugs out of our waters and prevent drug abuse. While the law begins to take effect on January 6, 2019, much work remains to ensure that the program is effectively rolled out throughout 2019. In December, we attended a meeting held by the Governor's office and called for the program to provide convenient access to drug drop boxes for every community throughout the state.

Upcoming: Suffolk County: Change Out Your Septic System

Throughout 2018 we hosted a series of forums highlighting the importance of reducing nitrogen pollution from outdated septic systems and cesspools. We will be helping residents secure grants to change out their old systems for new, on-site, nitrogen-reducing treatment systems through Suffolk County's Reclaim Our Water program. We'll be continuing the series throughout the winter and spring of 2019, and our next forum will be at Sachem Public Library on January 14 at 7:00pm. We hope to see you there!

Upcoming: Vote "Yes" to Protect the Forge, Carlls, and Connetquot Rivers

On January 22, voters who live around the CarllsConnetquot, and Forge Rivers in Suffolk County will be able to vote on a ballot referendum that provides funding for homeowners to hook up to sewage treatment facilities. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for these communities to receive $390 million in state and federal funds that will allow residents to ditch their outdated septics and cesspools and move to sewers. Join us at community meetings (below) to learn more about each project and find out if you are eligible to vote. If you live in one of the project areas, don't forget to vote "Yes" on January 22. Community meetings include:

  • Forge River: January 8, 11:00am and 7:00pm, Mastic Fire Department, 1080 Mastic Road, Mastic, NY.

  • Carlls River: January 10, 6:00pm, North Babylon Volunteer Fire Company, 20 Hale Road, North Babylon, NY.

  • Connetquot River: January 18, 7:00pm, Timber Point Elementary School, 200 Timber Point Road, East Islip, NY.

Chemical from Brookhaven lab may have spread to residential wells

Source: Newsday

Chemical from Brookhaven lab may have spread to residential wells

Brookhaven National Laboratory's advisory council has recommended 97 properties in East Yaphank south of the Upton lab be tested for a chemical that was in firefighting foams once used at the lab.

BY DAVID M. SCHWARTZ

Posted: January 2, 2019
Originally Published: December 31, 2018

Contamination from a firefighting foam has been found at Brookhaven National Laboratory, raising concerns from an advisory group that a soon-to-be-regulated chemical has spread off-site to private residential wells.

The lab's community advisory council urged BNL to test 97 properties in East Yaphank south of the lab for per- and polyfuoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a group of artificially made chemicals that includes perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). The chemical, which was in firefighting foams used at the lab from the 1960s until 2008, is expected to be regulated next year by New York State, officials said.

In a Nov. 8 letter, the council wrote that it "is concerned about members of the public utilizing private wells that live south of the Laboratory and may be adversely impacted by PFAS contamination," according to the letter from the 26-member advisory council, made up of civic board representatives, scientists and environmentalists, to lab director Doon Gibbs. "The members of the CAC [community advisory council] are hopeful that the practice of prioritizing public health, environmental and groundwater protection will continue and that BNL will test all private wells contained in the 97 additional properties."

Brookhaven National Lab officials said last week they had not decided whether to test the wells outside the lab, south of the Long Island Expressway, and was working with local, state and federal regulators. BNL is a research institution funded primarily by the U.S. Department of Energy, with almost 3,000 employees and 4,000 visiting researchers studying physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, and applied science.

Brookhaven has continued to drill wells on the 5,265-acre lab grounds in Upton to see how far the contamination has spread. The chemical has been detected at the highest levels around its current and former fire stations, and in three of five drinking water supply wells. 

"We recognize how important this issue is. We’re trying to move forward as quickly as we can, working with the regulators," Jason Remien, manager of the lab's environmental protection division, said Wednesday.

Officials from the state DEC and Department of Health said in a joint statement they were evaluating the need to test the wells "as part of their comprehensive investigation of contamination."

The Suffolk County Department of Health Services had requested private well testing for about 97 properties, in an area that stretches south from the lab to Sunrise Highway, according to a PowerPoint presentation given to the advisory council in October.

"It is the position of Suffolk County Department of Health Services that due to the detection of PFAS in groundwater on BNL property above the EPA health advisory level, the U.S. Department of Energy should pay for PFAS testing in private wells down-gradient of BNL," according to a statement from health department spokeswoman Grace Kelly-McGovern. 

Private wells are not regularly tested or treated, and are generally shallower than those drilled by public water providers, meaning health officials fear they're more susceptible to pollution. The number of private wells on Long Island is unknown, though water officials estimate up to 40,000 homes are on private wells.

The group of chemicals at issue increasingly have become a concern among regulators and environmentalists. Health effects include liver damage, decreased fertility, developmental delays in fetuses and children, and is considered a possible carcinogen, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The detection of PFOS in groundwater prompted the state to add Gabreski Air National Guard Base in Westhampton Beach and a Suffolk County fire-training center in Yaphank to the state Superfund list because of contaminated water supplies. The chemicals have shown up in private wells in nearby Wainscott, as well as in public wells in Hampton Bays.

A state panel this month recommended a drinking water standard of 10 parts per trillion for PFOS and a related chemical PFOA, used in manufacturing, which would be the most protective drinking water standards in the nation. The state health commissioner is expected to set a standard next year.

Historical photos included in the lab's presentation to the advisory group show firefighting foam spilling onto the ground during training exercises in 1966 and a demonstration of a fire suppression system in 1970.

Testing wells installed near the lab's current firehouse found levels of PFOA and PFOS up to 12,400 parts per trillion, and at 5,370 parts per trillion at the lab's former firehouse, according to a statement from lab spokesman Pete Genzer. Those two sites were believed to be the "primary locations" where firefighting foam was used during training.

The Suffolk Department of Health Services tested drinking water supply wells in 2017 as part of a national program to collect data on emerging contaminants of concern to the public. The detection at BNL previously had not been reported.

The contamination has been found at three of the five drinking water supply wells at BNL; two at levels of up to 27 parts per trillion, and one at up to 70.4 parts per trillion, though Remien said he believes there was a quality assurance problem with the highest sample, from June 2018. Other samples were below 70 parts per trillion, which is the current EPA health advisory level for PFOS.

One supply well is no longer used, and the lab is re-establishing carbon filtration on the other two wells, Genzer said in a statement. Tests of treated drinking water at the lab are less than 3 parts per trillion, he said.

Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment and a member of the CAC, said BNL shouldn't delay testing the private wells.

"To be a good neighbor, they should just test the wells," she said. "It is an ethical obligation of BNL to test their neighbors' wells for contamination they may have caused."

Legis. Al Krupski (D-Copiague), whose district includes the lab, said he believes BNL is evaluating other potential sources of contamination.

"I think they have to do their due diligence, and I have confidence they will. They have addressed environmental concerns in the past," he said.

Raymond Keenan, representative for Affiliated Brookhaven Civic Organizations, said, "I don’t have a feeling they’re sitting on this, but it’s a bureaucracy. They have to go through their motions."

Mike Giacomaro, president of the East Yaphank Civic Association, said most of the homes in the area have been offered hookups to public water supplied by the Suffolk County Water Authority because of pollution passed from BNL, including tritium in the groundwater.


Town scores $80K to cut energy costs, pollution

Source: Long Island Business News

Town scores $80K to cut energy costs, pollution

BY ADINA GENN

Posted: January 2, 2019
Originally Published: December 31, 2018

The Town of Hempstead was awarded an $80,000 grant from New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to develop an energy and sustainability master plan to help slash the municipality’s carbon footprint and energy costs.

According to the DEC, the plan will include updating the town’s energy, fleet, and greenhouse gas inventory data and assessing all energy and sustainability related polices. The analysis will aim to indicate where the town made progress and highlight opportunities for improvement, addition of new policies or programs, or expansion of existing programs.

Officials say that last year the town spent nearly $8 million in gas and electric. But each year, they say, those costs increase by an average of 3.2 percent even if its energy consumption stays the same.

“The development of a green innovation economy is not only beneficial to the environment, it is better for the bottom-line, saving taxpayers money,” Town of Hempstead Supervisor Laura Gillen said in a statement.

“By setting goals to decrease our reliance on fossil fuels and making purchases that are more environmentally friendly, we can combat the disastrous effects of climate change,” she said.

“A comprehensive sustainability plan is important for the betterment of the environment in the Town of Hempstead,” State Sen. Todd Kaminsky said in a statement.

He said that by implementing the plan, the town would “become a leader in advancing renewable energy.”

As a proponent of protecting the environment, Kaminsky said earlier this year that “we need to be aggressive and we need to act quickly, but we need to be thoughtful.”

In July, the town became the largest local municipality in the state to take the “climate smart communities pledge,” officials said. That meant pledging to reduce community energy use and the discharge of pollutants into the environment, while increasing the use of renewable resources.

The pledge also calls for boosting local resiliency projects and other public works to prepare for the effects of climate change that can endanger the town’s infrastructure and economy and that might also pose health threats to the community.

That commitment scored high marks from advocates for the environment.

“The South Shore of Long Island is currently engaged in an historic battle to protect our communities from climate change impacts,” Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, said in a statement.

The pledge “will have a positive impact locally and regionally. Reducing greenhouse gases, saving tax dollars, and fighting climate change is just good government,” she added.

Retail Roundup: Complaints snagged 12 stores not charging for single-use bags

Source: Newsday

Retail Roundup: Complaints snagged 12 stores not charging for single-use bags

The Suffolk County Department of Health Services imposes a penalty of up to $500 if a bag violation is cited upon re-inspection.

BY TORY N. PARRISH

Posted: January 2, 2019
Originally Published: December 31, 2018

Retailers say Suffolk County’s bag-fee law is working as intended, but how many are violating the law by not charging customers for bags?

The Suffolk County Department of Health Services said it has received 24 complaints about noncompliant stores since Jan. 1, 2018, when a law began requiring supermarkets, pharmacies, clothing stores and other types of retailers to charge customers 5 cents for each single-use plastic and paper bag they use to carry out their purchases.

“Twelve covered stores were found to be in violation of the law. Zero stores were in violation upon reinspection,” the department said.

The department imposes a penalty of up to $500 if a violation is cited upon re-inspection. No stores have been fined, it said.

The 24 complaints about noncompliant stores came from consumers, but the department does have inspectors out doing spot checks, the agency said.

The number of cited complaints is small considering that, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Suffolk County has 5,500 retail trade establishments, excluding furniture stores, car dealerships and non-store retailers. 

The county's bag-fee law, which raised the ire of some shoppers when it went into effect, is intended to increase the utilization of reusable bags and reduce the number of single-use plastic bags polluting waterways. Suffolk County does not receive any portion of the bag fees collected by stores.

The county’s law requires the health department to prepare an annual recycling report by March 1 on the legislation’s progress, including information on any cost savings for the county from reductions in contaminated waterways and on the benefits of waste and litter reduction.

I reported on Dec. 20 that the Food Industry Alliance of New York State said its survey of Suffolk County grocery stores that are members of the trade group showed an 80 percent decline in the distribution of single-use bags in the first and second quarters of 2018.

Twenty cities, towns and villages in New York State have enacted single-use bag fees or bans, including Long Beach and the Village of Sea Cliff in Nassau County, according to the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, an advocacy group based in Farmingdale. New York City’s fee was blocked by Gov. Andrew Cuomo in 2017.

New Tanger tenants

Shoes, shirts and shades. Oh, my.

Two new tenants, Cole Haan Outlet and Looks & Co. Designer Glasses, opened at Tanger Outlets Deer Park in November. Also, one of the premium-brand shopping center’s existing shops, a Polo Ralph Lauren Factory Store, relocated to a space that is about 40 percent bigger in October.

“We are excited to welcome all of the new additions,” said Nancy W. Larson, general manager for the shopping center.

Looks & Co., which sells designer prescription sunglasses and eyeglasses, opened Nov. 3 in a 2,007-square-foot space, suite 1450, that was once occupied by Kay Jewelers.

The eyewear shop offers high-end brands such as Tom Ford, Versace, Gucci and Prada, said owner Rafael Hanukashvili.

A Dix Hills resident, Hanukashvili, 42, opened his first Looks & Co. store in Syosset in September 2016, he said.

“Customer service is the most important to me. … We make sure we can take care of everything for our customers,” he said.

Cole Haan Outlet sells shoes, outerwear and accessories. 

On Nov. 14 the store opened in a 2,400-square-foot spot in Tanger suite 1599, which was previously occupied by an Easy Spirit shoe store.

“New York is a strong market for Cole Haan, and this is an addition to the fleet,” the Greenland, New Hampshire-based retailer said.

The Deer Park Polo Ralph Lauren store, an outlet tenant since 2014, relocated to suite 301, a space of 10,283 square feet near the Neiman Marcus Last Call store, and opened there on Oct. 26.

“It was relocated just to have a more prominent space and a bigger footprint,” Manhattan-based Ralph Lauren Corp. said.

Polo Ralph Lauren Factory Stores sell clothing and accessories for adults and children.
Opened in 2008, Tanger Outlets Deer Park has 739,109 square feet of leasable space and was 97 percent occupied as of Sept. 30, according to a regulatory filing by Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc.

City 'Styrofoam' ban beginning on Jan. 1

Source: Queens Chronicle

City 'Styrofoam' ban beginning on Jan. 1

Substance banned for food, beverages, packaging

BY MICHAEL GANNON, EDITOR

Posted: January 2, 2019
Originally Published: December 27, 2018

New York City’s long-fought battle over single-use expanded polystyrene products, best known in the vernacular as “Styrofoam,” officially will end on Jan 1 when a citywide ban goes into effect.

Under the new laws, food service establishments, stores and manufacturers no longer can sell or offer EPF products for food sales or packaging, whether it be a cup for coffee, a “clamshell” container for a takeout food or foam packing peanuts used to ship and transport fragile objects.

The law was passed this past summer after a study determined that the material could not be easily recycled.

Some small businesses had opposed the move based on potential cost increases. But the city’s Department of Small Business Services has been accepting hardship waiver applications since July from nonprofits and small businesses with less than $500,000 in annual revenue.

The applications are available online at nyc.gov/foamwaiver.

A spokeswoman for the city Department of Sanitation told the Chronicle in an email that anyone who may have received a gift or other package containing foam packaging material and who wants to get rid of it may do so by “discarding them as garbage on their regular collection days.”

Employees at two delis visited by the Chronicle this week declined to comment or have their photographs taken.

Sandwiches sold in both places were wrapped in white paper, foil or both. Other foods were packaged in aluminum containers with lids of either clear plastic or cardboard.

Coffee and tea at each deli and a pair of Dunkin’ Donuts shops were served in paper cups, though the lids were plastic.

Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, on Wednesday called the coming implementation a victory for both the environment and public health.

“New York City residents will be healthier, because people microwave food in those containers, drink from those containers which allow toxins to leech into their food,” Esposito said.

She said it was her organization’s hope that the New York City ban will attract the attention of Gov. Cuomo, the leadership of the state Assembly and the new Democratic leadership of the state Senate when the 2019 session convenes in Albany next week.

“New York City has sent a loud message across the bow of the New York State Legislature,” Esposito said.

Feds Hear Concerns Over Deepwater Wind Proposal

Feds Hear Concerns Over Deepwater Wind Proposal

BY JD ALLEN

Posted: November 7, 2018
Originally Published: November 6, 2018

Remarks by Brad Loewen, the chairman of the East Hampton Town Fisheries Advisory Committee, were met with cheers from most East End residents who packed American Legion Post 419 in Amagansett on Monday. 

At a public hearing, Mr. Loewen, a former town councilman, accosted U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management officials, saying that his voice as a resident and bayman felt “stifled,” as the federal government begins to draft an environmental impact statement for Deepwater Wind’s proposal to construct 15 wind-generated power turbines in the ocean off Block Island. 

“At worst, you don’t give a damn what we have to say, because you have already made up your minds,” he said. 

More than 100 residents came to the meeting to hear a presentation by BOEM officials and to comment on the federal review of the offshore wind energy project. 

Residents were given two minutes each to offer input on issues and concerns about the project, and were encouraged to submit written comments, or to comment online at regulations.gov, by November 19. More than 15 stations were set up around the room staffed with Virginia-based BOEM experts and Deepwater Wind community liaisons to answer questions about the project. 

Bayman like Mr. Loewen say the construction, operation and eventual decommission of Deepwater Wind’s renewable energy project would disrupt their business, and they fear the pile driving and dredging of the seabed to make way for underwater cables and turbine foundations would drive wildlife away from popular commercial fishing locations.

Mr. Loewen called for the federal government to compel Deepwater Wind to compensate commercial fishermen for lost revenue due to construction. He also called for fisheries, which he said bear “the weight of this proposal,” to have a seat at the table during all phases of the project. 

“We know this is our last, best hope,” Mr. Loewen said. 

BOEM Environmental Impact Statement Coordinator Mary Boatman said the agency is weighing whether to approve Deepwater Wind’s proposal, with or without modifications, to put a wind farm in the leasing area in federal waters—which requires public input to shape the project. 

In addition to asking the public for input, BOEM consults with other governing agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and regulations, such as the National Historic Preservation Act and the Coastal Zone Management Act, before it can let the applicant proceed.

“If we want to build a wind farm, we ask ourselves, ‘How are we going to do it with the fisheries in mind?’” said Aileen Kenney, the energy company’s senior vice president of development. 

Deepwater Wind touted throughout the night its community outreach on the docks with local fisheries. Fishing surveys for the project were even claimed to be done on commercial fishing vessels with fishermen. 

“In order to be successful in development, you have to make concessions,” she continued.

Deepwater Wind contends it has already changed its plans after discussions with East Hampton Town officials to get permission to bring the power cable to shore at Beach Lane in Wainscott to connect to the PSEG Long Island electric substation. The company has promised to increase the spacing between wind turbines to one mile, arrange the wind farm in a grid to not interfere with commercial passageways, and scrapped a northern cable route. 

Ms. Kenney also said that Ørsted, the Danish wind energy giant that purchased Deepwater Wind for $510 million in October, is committed to backing all of those promises made. 

Town officials, however, made it clear more still needs to be done.

Town Supervisor Peter Van Scoyoc, Councilman David Lys, Trustee Clerk Francis Bock and Trustee Rick Drew asked for the federal government to complete additional baseline studies on fish and wildlife habitats before it compiles its draft environmental impact statement. They also asked them to consider approving smaller cables with better insulation and fewer turbines installed farther apart, among other changes.

“This project will set an example for larger wind developments in that lease area off the coast,” Mr. Van Scoyoc said. “It is critically important that BOEM vet all of the environmental concerns, and the economic impacts on the fishing industry that supplies the traditional means of making a living here in town for the last 400 years.” 

Michael McDonald, a Springs resident and member of the East End Resilience Network, claimed the 15-turbine project was going to open the door to the long-term industrialization of the Atlantic Ocean.

“If our town has to absorb this kind of industrialization, it will change the character of the town,” he said. 

Other residents, like Michael Wootton of Wainscott, were concerned the project was far more extensive than what they were privy to. The fear is that what BOEM is considering has doubled in size since it was first proposed, laying the groundwork for a larger plan. The plan submitted to BOEM suggests the project has grown to a 180-megawatt wind farm with two 230-kilovolt transmission cables coming to shore or to potentially an offshore substation. 

The area leased by Deepwater can accommodate more than 100 wind turbines, which is set by the energy company and not by federal limitations. Also, there are more federal waters designated for wind energy projects close by, and other projects in the works. In addition there is another, separate proposal BOEM is considering to open up about 287 square miles of the Atlantic Ocean south of Fire Island for wind farm development.

Mr. Wootton said that, to make matters worse, BOEM has never stopped a project from happening or approved a project of this scale—even though there is another Deepwater Wind project off the coast of Block Island. “Block Island is not a barrier beach,” Mr. Wootton said. “You’ve never done this before.”

Ms. Boatman contends that even though there are multiple irons in the fire, if the project was to be approved, Deepwater Wind would be allowed to build only within regulations. “The only thing we are looking at, and what can be built if approved, is for 15 turbines,” Ms. Boatman said.

“But we are looking at a broader future here, too—cumulative, outside this project,” said Michelle Morin, the regional environmental branch chief at BOEM. 

Meanwhile, some residents, like Don Matheson of East Hampton, wholeheartedly supported the proposal, saying that the larger benefit to combat climate change is more important, and “the ship has sailed” when it comes to over-industrialization of the South Fork. 

“It’s this or it’s going to be something else to keep up for the increased demand for electricity and combat climate change,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of the Citizens Campaign for the Environment, which is based in Farmingdale. “Or we make an effort to stop development—but you can ask the supervisor how that’s going.”

As the meeting came to a close, Steve Williams, the president of the Azurest Homeowners Association in Sag Harbor, asked, when all said and done, what electricity is going to cost the average resident.

Jennifer Garvey, the Long Island development manager at Deepwater Wind, said that LIPA figures put the rate at 16 cents per kilowatt—even if there are delays to construction or setbacks. That’s lower than what the New York State comptroller’s office has said the cost of the LIPA contract for power from the wind farm will be, saying the cost to ratepayers is an average of about 22.5 cents per kilowatt over the 20-year life of the project. 

“The risk is ours to bear,” Ms. Garvey said.

“Just remember us, please,” Mr. Williams said. “We are part of the environment, too.”

Brookhaven Residents and Teachers Sue Over Landfill

Brookhaven Residents and Teachers Sue Over Landfill

Brookhaven Residents and Teachers Sue Over Landfill

After years of suffering health impacts and diminished quality of life due to unbearable odors from the Brookhaven Landfill, community members, teachers, and parents have filed a lawsuit against the Town. CCE joined plaintiffs and lawyers at a press conference announcing that 25 plaintiffs filed a Notice of Claim, which means the Town has 90 days to respond before the lawsuits get filed in NYS Supreme Court. This action is an act of last resort because the Town has ignored requests to meet. At Frank P. Long School, 35 out of 105 staff members have been diagnosed with cancer. You can watch the press conference on Facebook.

October Newsletter

Highlights

Don't Drown Our Communities to Save NYC

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is creating a plan to combat future flooding in the New York metropolitan area, which could include massive storm barriers spanning New York Harbor, Western Long Island Sound, and other bays and tributaries. These storm surge barriers could permanently alter the landscape and health of these waterbodies and flood coastal communities in Long Island, Connecticut, and Westchester. They would also do nothing to address the real issue of climate change! In October, we worked with Congressman Tom Suozzi to get the Army Corps to hold a public meeting about its plan on Long Island. Prior to the meeting, we held a press conference with our partners at Save the Sound, Manhasset Bay Protection Committee, Hempstead Harbor Protection Committee, Coalition to Protect Hempstead Harbor, and Friends of the Bay to raise concerns about this "Gates from Hell" proposal.

CCE's Adrienne Esposito Launches "Earth Witness News" Radio Show

Want to get the latest on cutting edge environmental issues from the person fighting for all of us 365 days a year? Adrienne Esposito is now hosting a radio show on WCRN 103.9 on the first Friday of the month at noon. The show premiered on October 5, and we just had another great show on November 2, featuring Carl LoBue from The Nature Conservancy discussing ocean protection. Tune in next month for more Earth Witness News!

Happenings

Showcasing Green Projects in Buffalo that Protect the Great Lakes

We were pleased to organize a tour, led by our friends at PUSH Buffalo, of green infrastructure projects in the City of Buffalo. Green infrastructure is a network of decentralized stormwater management practices, such as rain gardens, green roofs, trees, and permeable pavement, that can capture and infiltrate rain where it falls. Not only is this reducing polluted runoff and sewage overflows that can pollute Lake Erie, but it is beautifying neighborhoods and creating training and employment opportunities for the community too!

Saying No to the Caithness II Power Plant on Long Island

Long Island's energy demand is stable, and PSEG has announced that renewable energy, not fossil fuels, is the most cost-effective and reliable way to meet the island's future energy needs. Despite there being no need for this project, the Town of Brookhaven has decided to allow Caithness to move forward with a 600 MW fossil fuel plant. This project will worsen the already poor air quality in Suffolk County and stifle efforts to transition to wind and solar. In October, we joined our partners in the Stop Caithness II Coalition for a press conference and rally, and then headed into Town Hall where we testified in opposition to this unnecessary, polluting power plant.

Reducing Plastic Bag Pollution in CT

CCE is a member of the Reusable Bag Alliance in Connecticut, a coalition made up of local groups working together to pursue a statewide plastic bag ban in 2019. In October, the Coalition met to discuss the problem of plastic pollution, existing strategies for encouraging reusable bag use, and potential bag ban legislation. The coalition includes members from BYO Greenwich, BYO Stamford, Citizens Campaign for the Environment, the CT Food Association, and several other statewide and local environmental groups. Stay tuned for more info on how you can help get a statewide BYOBag bill passed in 2019!

Celebrating the South Shore Estuary Reserve: Boat Trip and Stewardship Awards

CCE, along with our partners in the South Shore Estuary Reserve, hosted the SSER Boat Tour and Stewardship Awards aboard the Lauren Kristy on the Great South Bay. Mr. Scott Bochner was honored for his dedication to protecting and restoring the Western Bays, fighting to upgrade the Bay Park Sewage Treatment Plant, and consistent efforts in removing marine debris from the SSER. The other awardees were Mr. George Remmer and Mr. Richard Remmer, of the Snapper Inn, for their dedication to supporting the restoration of the South Shore Estuary Reserve, contribution to needed water quality monitoring, and generously providing resources to assist in protection efforts.

Finding Out Where Our Congressional Candidates Stand on the Environment

In October, we cosponsored and participated on a panel that asked questions in a debate between District 1 Congressman Lee Zeldin and his challenger, Perry Gershon. We found out where each candidate stands on critical Long Island environmental issues, including Plum Island protection, opposing offshore drilling, fostering renewable energy development, and reducing pollution to our ground and surface waters.

Protecting Our Drinking Water from 1,4-Dioxane

CCE is fighting for a health-based NYS drinking water standard for 1,4-dioxane, a likely carcinogen that has been detected at high levels in Long Island wells. Not only do we need to ban 1,4-dioxane in personal care products, but we need to treat the existing contamination to protect public health as well. In October, we attended a meeting of the NYS Drinking Water Quality Council to continue discussions on setting a state standard for 1,4-dioxane and PFOA, two emerging contaminants that are polluting drinking water in NY. We are calling for a health-based drinking water standard by the end of the year.

Calling for the Cleanup of a Long Island Superfund Site

The NYS DEC has proposed a cleanup plan for a portion of the DZUS superfund site on Long Island, located in West Islip. We attended the public meeting and submitted comments calling on the DEC to improve the proposed cleanup plan, which would remove only 19,000 cubic yards of sediment. We support Alternative 3, which provides the most comprehensive cleanup for this site. Alternative 3 will remove all of the contaminated sediment—24,000 cubic yards—at a cost of only $2 million dollars more than DEC's proposal.

Seventh Annual "Water We Going to Do?"

The Long Island Clean Water Partnership held our annual "Water We Going to Do?" Conference in October. We heard our federal, state, and local officials, as well as scientific experts, give updates on Long Island's fight against nitrogen pollution and other impairments facing our water resources. Keynote speaker Dr. Christopher Patrick offered some hope for our own waters as he discussed the success of the Chesapeake Bay restoration project. Thanks to everyone who turned out and made it our best conference yet!

Suffolk County: Change Out Your Septic System

Over the summer and fall, we have been hosting a series of forums highlighting the importance of reducing nitrogen pollution from outdated septic systems and cesspools. We will be helping residents secure grants to change out their old systems for new, on-site, nitrogen-reducing treatment systems through Suffolk County's Reclaim Our Water program. So far, we have held forums for residents of Huntington, Smithtown, Centereach, Cold Spring Harbor, and Riverhead, and have received a great response. Our next forum is at East Northport Public Library on November 29, and we hope to see you there!

Recycling is piling up at LI facilities, as China puts limits on buying

Recycling is piling up at LI facilities, as China puts limits on buying

Declining prices caused by restrictions imposed this year by China could lead to changes in the way many Long Islanders dispose of paper and other material.

BY DAVID M. SCHWARTZ AND CARL MACGOWAN

Posted: October 30, 2018
Originally Published: October 29, 2018

Thousands more tons of Long Island recyclables are ending up as trash compared to prior years because of plummeting prices caused by restrictions imposed this year by China, the world's largest importer of recycled cardboard and plastics, recycling operators said.

The restrictions have upended Long Island's already struggling recycling efforts, and could lead to changes in the way many Long Islanders dispose of paper and other material — particularly in towns that switched to once-heralded "single stream" recycling programs that allowed residents to combine paper, plastic, aluminum and glass in one container, officials said.

In some cases, towns that have made money in past years from selling recycled cardboard and paper have now had to pay to get rid of it because China will no longer buy it. China is seeking to stimulate its domestic recycling market and be more environmentally responsible.

The problem reached a flash point last week when Green Stream Recycling told Brookhaven officials it could no longer run the town's recycling facility. Green Stream is expected to fold, and Brookhaven on Thursday expects to name a new operator to temporarily run the recycling system while town officials weigh their long-term options. Brookhaven plans to continue the single stream program.

Haulers such as West Babylon-based Winters Bros. Waste Systems, a Green Stream co-owner and one of the Island's largest single-stream recyclers, say the declining recyclables market makes it nearly impossible for them to make a living. 

“I’ve never seen it this bad, and I’ve been in this business for 35 years,” said Will Flower, vice president of Winters Bros. “In some cases, the material no longer has a home. It’s no longer recyclable.”

Though fluctuating commodities prices are considered normal in the waste industry, Brookhaven and Green Stream previously had touted the town's single-stream program since it began in 2014.

In its first year using single stream, the town saw a 25 percent increase in the number of homes that recycled. Similar increases were reported by towns such as Smithtown, Huntington and Southold that agreed to transfer their recyclables to the Brookhaven plant.

But this year, nearly 22 percent of recyclable paper, plastic, cardboard and aluminum brought to the Brookhaven facility has gone to incinerators or landfills, double the rates of 2016 and 2017, according to figures provided by Green Stream. The Brookhaven plant also processes collections from single-stream programs in several villages and school districts.

The additional material thrown away is on pace to be more than 7,000 tons by the end of the year — and doesn’t include glass, which hasn't been recycled from curbside bins for years. Instead, glass is crushed up and used as cover and drainage at Brookhaven's landfill, town and company officials said.

The increased rate is one result of a recycling market roiled across the country since Jan. 1, when China implemented policies — known as "National Sword" — aimed at boosting the country's environment and stimulating its domestic recyclables market. Those policies banned the import of some recyclable materials and required higher quality for other items like cardboard, national and local experts say.

Among the recent effects from the changing market:

Recyclables spilled out of the Brookhaven facility this summer as space ran out inside and no one would buy the material. Eventually, the newspaper and cardboard left out in the rain was composted in Brookhaven with the permission of the state Department of Environmental Conservation.
Green Stream, saying it could not afford to operate the Brookhaven plant, pulled out of its deal with the town. Brookhaven officials have said Green Stream owes the town $1.7 million in unpaid fees and bills, which Flower said the company likely will not pay.

  • Huntington said Brookhaven officials announced they will discontinue an agreement to take Huntington's recyclables at the end of this year. Huntington had been making $8 per ton from shipping paper, plastics and other material to Brookhaven, but capacity shortages at the Brookhaven facility have forced Huntington to pay $10 per ton to take material to a private waste facility, Huntington Director of Environmental Waste Management John Clark said in an email.

  • Smithtown and Huntington are seeking new recycling vendors. Those towns and Southold and Oyster Bay towns all have said they are reconsidering their single-stream recycling programs.

  • Recommendations including doubling the bottle and can fee to 10 cents, adding a fee on liquor and wine bottles and removing glass from curbside collections, along with an aggressive public education campaign about how to recycle better, are among proposals from a Long Island recycling advisory committee to the state DEC in October.


China is by far the world's largest consumer of U.S. recyclables, dating to the early 1990s, when the nation's voracious appetite for cardboard and plastic coincided with efforts by American cities and towns to ramp up nascent recycling programs. Both countries benefited from a system in which discarded cardboard was shipped to China, then came back to the United States as recycled boxes containing consumer goods before going back to China to be recycled once again.

Before this year, China consumed as much as 40 percent of the United States’ exported recyclables — more than the next 10 foreign nations combined, said Adina Renee Adler, senior director for government relations and international affairs at the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, a Washington, D.C., trade group.

“Because China gave us very little time to transition, it gives the recyclers very little time to find other markets,” Adler said.

Total value of waste and scrap exports to China by month

Scrap exports to China have declined since the ban on several types of plastics and mixed paper took effect Jan. 1 and all but halted in May when China temporarily suspended pre-shipment inspections.

China is trying to stamp out "contamination" — the waste industry term for recyclables that contain residue such as moisture and glue from packing tape and labels. Locally, inspectors hired by a Chinese firm now prod bales of paper with moisture detectors and examine piles of cardboard for contaminants such as glass shards before they are loaded into containers destined for overseas markets, local operators said.

Costs have climbed as companies and municipalities have slowed down conveyor belts and added additional staff to better sort streams of recyclables. Islip Town, which runs its own dual-stream recycling facility, last month approved $100,000 in unbudgeted overtime for recycling sorting.

At the same time, prices for recycled material have plummeted. Baled cardboard that could once be sold for $180 a ton is now down to nearly $60 a ton, Flower said.

Winters Bros. says it will have to alter or change some contracts under language usually reserved for natural disasters.

The Town of Oyster Bay has already agreed not to extend their single stream contract with Winters Bros. past Dec. 31, citing litigation fears, and will rebid their recycling contract in the coming weeks. 

"Anyone in the recycling business would describe this as a crisis," Flower said.

Not everyone agrees, pointing to the recycling industry's cyclical nature, including frequent price fluctuations.

"I would not characterize it as a crisis. I’d characterize it as challenging times due to changing trends and changing markets," said Martin Brand, deputy commissioner for the state DEC's office of remediation and materials management.

He said he was unaware of additional recyclable material heading to landfills or incinerators, and said no permission has been granted for recyclers to landfill or incinerate recyclables. Some municipalities had requested permission to landfill or incinerate recyclables at a statewide meeting on the recycling changes this summer, but DEC did not give them permission, he said.

The changes in the recycling stream have ignited a debate over the benefits of single-stream recycling and dual-stream, where residents put out paper products one week and then the rest of the recyclables the next week.

Single-stream recycling increases participation in municipal recycling programs, but mixing paper products with cans and bottles leaves cardboard spoiled by rainwater and carbonated soda, or torn by broken glass.

“You can’t unscramble an egg,” Susan Collins, president of the Container Recycling Institute of Culver City, California, said in an interview. “Putting all these items in the same cart leads to contamination.”

Some residents also deposit non-recyclables — everything from food and soccer balls to garden hoses — into recycling containers, a phenomenon that waste officials call "wish-cycling."

Some local operators said that single stream, by creating a contaminated stream, has forced China's crackdown on recycling.

As single-stream recycling grew, not just on Long Island but nationally, the product coming out of the United States became more contaminated, said Patricia DiMatteo, owner of Omni Recycling of Babylon, a dual-stream facility. People became less discerning about what they threw into their recycling bins, she said. While Omni Recycling has had to more carefully sort its recycling stream, the amount that it sends to landfills — yard waste, hoses, cheese-stained pizza boxes — has remained about the same, she said.

"In my opinion, it was the advent of single-stream recycling that destroyed the market," DiMatteo said.

When Brookhaven announced its single-stream program in 2014, town officials envisioned the plant becoming a regional processing center that would serve municipalities across Long Island. Green Stream had poured $7 million to upgrade the facility in Brookhaven hamlet.

In 2015, the plant expanded after the DEC imposed a $25,000 fine for violations including the disposing of recyclables as waste.

With Green Stream leaving the facility, Brookhaven officials have said the program's new operator will have the option of continuing with single stream — or switching to a dual-stream system.

Before the recycling game changed

Here are the number of tons of recycled and unrecycled waste reported by each Long Island town in 2016*, the latest year available.

* Islip failed to file a 2016 report, so we used its 2017 report; all other town and city data are from 2016, the most recent year available from all other municipalities.

Towns such as Islip and Southampton that stuck with dual-stream recycling said their operations have fared better than single-stream programs. The amount of material that ends up as garbage has not increased because separated recyclables are less contaminated and therefore more attractive to buyers, they said.
Jim Heil, Islip's former waste commissioner, said the town's decision not to convert to single stream a few years ago is paying off.

"We looked at it when it was all the rage. We stayed the course, decided to do what we were continuing to do," Heil, who co-chairs the recycling committee with Flower, said. "It's to our benefit now, with the blip in the market."

Robert Lange, executive director of North Hempstead's Solid Waste Management Authority, who ran New York City's recycling program for 20 years as the director before that, said residents have to be better educated on what to recycle, and be encouraged to recycle more.

But he warned that some of the concerns are overblown and he has seen contractors in the past try to use bad market conditions to renegotiate contracts.

"I think there’s hype right now and whenever there’s any kind of drama like that, someone’s going to use it as an opportunity to readjust things in their favor," he said.

Some of recycling's issues existed long before China’s new policy, even if they were rarely talked about outside industry circles. 

In some cases, materials can't be sold at all. Certain kinds of thin plastic food containers, for example, are incinerated or landfilled, Flower said.

Glass, when crushed and colors are mixed, has rarely been sold on recycling markets. The industry has also struggled with plastic bags and hoses getting caught in recycling machinery.

“A good market hid a lot of sins,” Flower said.

Peter Scully, former regional DEC director and former vice-chair of the New York State Solid Waste Management Board, said the towns should not have rushed into single-stream recycling.

"A better approach might have been to undertake single stream on a pilot basis to make sure it was sustainable over the long-term, and didn’t generate excess amounts of reject material, as a result of cross-contamination of paper products with broken glass," he said.

Some environmentalists agreed that big changes to recycling are needed, including more education for residents on what to recycle and state incentives or investments to encourage local recycling markets.

“Recycling was never free, now we're faced with what the actual costs are going to be,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

"We were misled years ago that single stream would be helpful for recycling. In fact, it’s been extremely harmful," she said. "It contaminates some material. And hasn’t brought any benefit and has only brought contamination of the material. It’s a disaster."

R. Lawrence Swanson, associate dean for Stony Brook University’s School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, said contract squabbles between recyclers and municipalities, such as the one between Oyster Bay and Winters Bros., could become more common.

“Probably some of those agreements are going to be in disarray and there’s going to be a need or an attempt to renegotiate,” Swanson said.

Environmentalists: New power plant would be detrimental to LI

Environmentalists: New power plant would be detrimental to LI

Posted: October 29, 2018
Originally Published: October 25, 2018

FARMINGVILLE -

Environmentalists say a new power plant coming to Yaphank would be detrimental to Long Island.

“The last thing Long Island needs is a power plant that will shackle us to fossil fuels for the next 50 years,” says Adrienne Esposito, of Citizens Campaign for the Environment.

The power plant, dubbed Caithness II, got the green light in 2014 when the Brookhaven Town Board voted 5-2 in favor of it. Back then, Caithness Long Island proposed a facility with two smokestacks. Plans for the project have since been downsized to 600 watts with one smokestack.

Plant opponents made their voices heard during the public comment portion of Thursday night’s Brookhaven Town Board meeting. But not everyone was opposed to the plant. One truck drove around Town Hall with a message in support of the plant.

News 12 reached out to Caithness about the plant. It called Caithness II a modern clean-burning, gas-fired plant that “will also support the increased use of renewable resources, like solar and wind, during times when those resources are not available.”

But environmentalists say they still have their concerns.

Town Supervisor Ed Romaine made it clear at the meeting that the town board will take no further action on Caithness II.

News 12 is told that Caithness is working through the permit process to finish the plant.

Watch the video.

Hempstead to Replace Lead Pipes

Hempstead to replace lead pipes

Project aims to prevent water-supply contamination

BY BRIDGET DOWNES

Posted: October 25, 2018
Originally Published: October 25, 2018

Town of Hempstead officials announced last week that the town would replace 100-year-old lead water pipes that service Point Lookout residents because they pose a potential health risk.

More than 500 pipes are to be replaced with copper ones, Town Supervisor Laura Gillen said at a news conference in Point Lookout on Oct. 18. The town received a $600,000 grant from the state Department of Health to switch out the pipes for more than 1,200 Point Lookout residents.

“This is aging infrastructure that is all over America and all over New York state,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment. “Lead is known to actually build up in the body and cause very serious ailments, particularly for children and developing fetuses. It causes such things as learning disabilities, anemia. It damages blood cells. It also damages the kidney, the liver and the neurological system.”

John Reinhardt, the town water commissioner, said that trace amounts of lead could be found in samples that were drawn in Point Lookout, but they were below the federal standard for safe drinking water. Gillen said there is “no reason for alarm” because the pipes had not leached lead into the water supply.

The corrosion of lead pipes can cause toxins to leach into the water, as was the case in 2014, when the water supply for more than 100,000 residents of Flint, Mich., was contaminated, Gillen recalled.

“The federal regulation for lead is 15 parts per billion, but the [Environmental Protection Agency] recommends actually a zero tolerance for lead because it’s so highly poisonous,” Esposito said. “I think that’s why being proactive and changing these pipes out before they begin to leach is so critical. Even the existing standard is really not safe enough.”

The town regularly tests its water to ensure that it is free of contaminants, including lead, Gillen said. The pipes that are now being used — one- to two-foot-long tubes called “goosenecks” — connect the water main to the service line. The lead goosenecks were standard issue in the 1920s, Gillen explained, when Point Lookout was transitioning from a seasonal beach bungalow community to a year-round residential one.

The current industry standard is copper pipes, Gillen added, noting that the town will begin to replace the pipes next month. Town employees worked with Reinhardt for months to survey the community, inspect underground infrastructure and identify where the lead pipes were located, officials said.

“The best thing a homeowner can do is when they use their water first thing in the morning, let the water run for a minute or so just to flush their own system in their house,” Reinhardt said.

Town officials said the pipes are in relatively good condition but are reaching the end of their lifespan. “This is a proactive project that is seeking to address potential health risks before they become an issue, not afterwards,” Gillen said.

Point Lookout Civic Association President Matt Brennan said there would be minimal disruptions for residents, and that he would work to keep people informed throughout the process.

“It’s better to prevent the contamination from getting in the water rather than filter it out afterwards,” Esposito said. “It’s $600,000 of prevention, which is worth millions of dollars of cleaning this up or dealing with people’s health concerns.”

Proposed Sea Gates in NYC to Guard Against Storm Surge Draws Concern from LI

Proposed sea gates in NYC to guard against storm surge draws concern from LI

The plans explore the feasibility of placing massive gates in the waters and sea walls on the shores to stem the tide during major weather events.

Posted: October 24, 2018
Originally Published: October 23, 2018

Long Island-based environmentalists urged the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to rethink several design plans to construct massive gates in the waters near New York City that might protect the city from a hurricane-induced storm surge but flow back onto coastal areas of Nassau and Suffolk, flooding those areas.

“We need the Army Corps to come up with a protection plan that not only protects New York City but also protects Long Island,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, who bemoaned the fact that Long Island was not considered in the proposals. “We love New York City but we don’t want to be sacrificed to protect it.”

Esposito spoke during a news conference with other activists before the Corps’ public hearing on the tidal gates at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy in Kings Point.

“Climate change and sea level rise is real and we have to figure out how we’re going to address it,” said Rep. Thomas Suozzi (D-Glen Cove), who urged the Army Corps to conduct a public hearing on Long Island before proceeding with what could be a $20 billion project.

As many as 75 people listened to the Army Corps outline five plans — one of which includes doing nothing — to guard against the effects of rising sea levels and events like superstorm Sandy. The plans explore the feasibility of placing massive gates in the waters and sea walls on the shores to stem the tide during major weather events.

Gates have been installed in a number of places around the world including Denmark, New Orleans, London and Holland, but area activists said conditions in those areas are unlike those in the New York area, where the gates would fend off an ocean’s wrath only to disperse the waters onto nearby tracts of land.

Bryce Wisemiller, project manager for the Army Corps of Engineers, walked the group of activists, elected officials and concerned citizens through the plans aided by renderings. He commented on their details. He stressed that the Corps is still in the preliminary stages of any project and that construction likely would not begin until 2030 or so.

Afterward, the audience posed dozens of questions, including “Do the gates move?”

The gates do move, he said. “That’s why we call them gates,” he said.

A draft study of the findings so far is scheduled to be released in January, Wisemiller said.

Environmentalists Wary of Plan to Build Storm Gates Around NYC, LI

Environmentalists wary of plan to build storm gates around NYC, LI

Posted: October 24, 2018
Originally Published: October 23, 2018

KINGS POINT - Environmentalists are urging the Army Corps of Engineers to reject a plan meant to protect New York from a major hurricane.

The Army Corps of Engineers is studying six options to protect New York and New Jersey's harbors and tributaries.

One option is to build giant storm gates and storm surge barriers around New York and Long Island.

Environmentalists fear the man-made barriers could deflect storm surges toward Long Island and increase coastal flooding.

"This to me is our modern day 'Watergate,' says Adrienne Esposito, of Citizens Campaign for the Environment. "They want to put up these water gates to protect the city but Long Island could indeed suffer severely for it."

Evironmentalists also are concerned that sea barriers would slowly cut off nutrients from New York Harbor and prevent contaminants from washing into the ocean.

At a public meeting Tuesday in Kings Point, the Army Corps tried to reassure Long Island residents.

"If there are indications that there will be those types of impacts, those alternatives will only go forward if we fully address those induced flooding impacts," says Bryce Wisemuller, of the Army Corps of Engineers.

A final plan is not expected to be released until 2021.

Watch the video.

September Newsletter

Highlights

Protecting Our Drinking Water from 1,4-Dioxane

CCE is fighting for a health-based NYS drinking water standard for 1,4-dioxane, a likely carcinogen that has been detected at high levels in Long Island wells. Not only do we need to ban 1,4-dioxane in personal care products, but we need to treat the existing contamination to protect public health as well. The NYS Drinking Water Council, which is charged with creating a drinking water standard for 1,4-dioxane, has yet to take action. In September, we joined NYS Senators Hannon, Marcellino, and Phillips to call on NYS to set a health-based drinking water standard and mandate the removal of this harmful chemical from our drinking water.

Keeping Up the Fight Against Plastic Pollution

September was a busy and very successful month in both NY and CT in our work to prevent plastic—from tiny plastic microfibers to the ubiquitous plastic bag—from polluting our communities and treasured waters:

Victory! Ulster Becomes First NY County to Ban Plastic Bags: The Ulster County Legislature passed a ban on single-use plastic bags, along with a 5-cent fee on paper bags, to incentivize people to BYOBag (bring your own bag). A huge thank you to Legislator Tracey Bartels and the other bill champions, who worked for years to pass a very strong BYOBag bill. Next up in Ulster: reducing plastic straws!

Victory! Stamford, CT Bans Plastic Bags: The Stamford Board of Representatives voted yes to ban single-use plastic bags and place a 10-cent fee on paper bags! Thank you to our partners at BYO Stamford and the hundreds of people who called their legislators this September in support of the bill.

Combating Plastic Microfibers in CT: We participated in the first meeting of the Connecticut Microfiber Working Group, a consortium of apparel industry professionals, environmental advocates, and academics working to identify the most common sources of plastic microfiber pollution and create a consumer awareness and education campaign about the problem. Up to 1.7 million tons of microfibers—often coming from clothing—enter our environment every year! We can get ahead of this problem, but the time for action is now.

Cleaning Up the Patchogue River: We joined the National Park Service and Village of Patchogue, NY for their annual river cleanup. Although BYOBag bills in Patchogue and Suffolk (along with the polystyrene ban in Patchogue) have helped reduce plastic litter, we still have a lot of work to do to prevent plastic pollution, and cleanups are still needed.

Happenings

Another Summer of Discontent for LI Waters

CCE and our partners the Long Island Clean Water Partnership joined Dr. Chris Gobler for our end of summer report on the state of Long Island's waters. Unfortunately, harmful algal blooms plagued our bays and estuaries and posed a growing threat to our fisheries, beaches, and public health once again. Excessive nitrogen from sewage and septic systems continues to degrade our waters, but there is some good news. In some areas where nitrogen pollution has been significantly reduced, like Western Long Island Sound, we are seeing improved water quality and decreased hypoxia! If you missed it, you can still watch the whole press conference.

Restoring the Great Lakes = Big Economic Returns

A new study by the University of Michigan showed that investments in the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) have resulted in a more than 3-1 return on investment. Not only is the GLRI making our lakes healthier, but it is also contributing to increased waterfront development, tourism, and home values, which all benefit the economy. The study looked at the City of Buffalo and found that Great Lakes restoration is estimated to provide more than a 4-1 return on investment in the decades to come! In September, we continued to fight for full funding of the GLRI, despite attempts by the President to slash funding for the critical program.

Pushing for Better Recycling in CT

CCE's Louis Burch was elected to the Connecticut Recycling Coalition (CRC) board at the CRC's annual business meeting in Branford, CT. CRC's membership includes corporate, municipal, institutional, and private members working to advance Connecticut's recycling and materials management programs and services on both the local and state levels. Formed in 1989, CRC assists members in improving the efficacy of their own programs, educating the community and advocating policies and programs that make recycling more effective, economical, and robust throughout the state. We're excited to join the CRC and advance recycling in CT!

Celebrating Long Island's Estuaries

In September, CCE joined our partners in Long Island water protection for Estuary Day at Seatuck Environmental Association in Islip. The event brought together diverse groups to celebrate the beauty and natural resources of Long Island's Estuaries of National Significance. The public had an opportunity to participate in a coastal cleanup, wildlife hikes, and information sessions to learn more about our local communities' efforts to protect Long Island's coastal waterways. We were delighted to collaborate with Cornell Cooperative Extension to give a presentation on our Sound Gardening program, with information on how homeowners can make landscaping choices that better protect Long Island's water for the future!

NY: We Want Offshore Wind

This summer, Governor Cuomo announced that NYS will be procuring 800 MW of offshore wind by 2019 as part of the State's goal of reaching 2,400 MW by 2030. Last month, CCE joined our environmental and labor partners at meetings held by NYSERDA in NYC and Long Beach to learn more about the plan to bring offshore wind to NY. Before the Long Beach meeting, we joined Senator Todd Kaminsky for a great press conference on the need to move forward with responsibly-sited wind projects and move away from fossil fuels.

CCE's Adrienne Esposito Wins HSBC Cares Customer of the Year Award

At a ceremony held at Gotham Hall, in New York City, HSBC Cares awarded CCE Executive Director Adrienne Esposito with its Customer of the Year for Environment Award. HSBC Cares is a program by HSBC Bank that recognizes community heroes. Adrienne was recognized as an HSBC customer who has made a significant contribution to protecting communities against environmental threats that imperil our air, water, and land.

Suffolk County: Change Out Your Septic System

Over the summer and fall, we have been hosting a series of forums highlighting the importance of reducing nitrogen pollution from outdated septic systems and cesspools. We will be helping residents secure grants to change out their old systems for new, on-site, nitrogen-reducing treatment systems through Suffolk County's Reclaim Our Water program. So far, we have held forums for residents of Huntington, Smithtown, Centereach, Cold Spring Harbor, and Riverhead and have received a great response. Our next forum is at East Northport Public Library on November 29, and we hope to see you there!

August Newsletter

Highlights

Brookhaven Residents and Teachers Sue Over Landfill

After years of suffering health impacts and diminished quality of life due to unbearable odors from the Brookhaven Landfill, community members, teachers, and parents have filed a lawsuit against the Town. CCE joined plaintiffs and lawyers at a press conference announcing that 25 plaintiffs filed a Notice of Claim, which means the Town has 90 days to respond before the lawsuits get filed in NYS Supreme Court. This action is an act of last resort because the Town has ignored requests to meet. At Frank P. Long School, 35 out of 105 staff members have been diagnosed with cancer.

Happenings

Improving Water Quality in Long Island Sound

As summer ends we are gearing up for the 2019 budget and urging our NYS leaders to push for critical funding and legislation to protect Long Island Sound. We attended a public hearing held by NYS Assembly Members Englebright and D'Urso in August focusing on improving water quality in Long Island Sound. CCE pushed our NYS leaders on Long Island Sound to champion priority legislation, including banning 1,4-dioxane in products, allowing Nassau and Suffolk Counties to create reoccurring revenue streams for sewage and septic upgrades, prohibiting offshore drilling, funding water quality monitoring in North Shore embayments, and passing a comprehensive Bring Your Own Bag bill to prevent plastic pollution.

Resisting EPA Attacks on the Environment

August was a busy month in our work to fight back against federal rollbacks to policies that protect public health and the environment. We weighed in against EPA's ill-conceived proposal to repeal the Clean Water Rule, which was established in 2015 to protect the streams and wetlands that support drinking water for 117 million Americans. We also opposed a proposed EPA policy that would restrict the use of sound science when establishing or evaluating policies, which in practice would make it easier for EPA to weaken or repeal regulations thoughtfully crafted to address a variety of key issues from climate change, to pesticides, to protecting children from lead in paint. 

Pushing for Better Recycling in CT

Connecticut is the epicenter of the U.S. reverse-vending industry, and CCE and our partners are committed to modernizing the state's bottle bill in 2019! In August, CCE and other members of the Connecticut Recyclers Coalition took a tour of Envipco's headquarters in Naugatuck. We got a firsthand glimpse of the company's state of the art manufacturing facility and an opportunity to check out the newest advancements in container-redemption technology.

Breaking the Plastic Habit at Alive After 5 in Patchogue

CCE joined tens of thousands Long Islanders at Alive After 5 in Patchogue this August for a great night of food, drinks, and live music. We joined our partners in the fight against plastic pollution to educate the public on the threat single-use plastics pose to marine life and urged people go plastic-free with pasta straws, reusable utensils, and reusable bags. Thanks to all of our partners at the event, who came with great games for kids, live animals, and giveaways. Patchogue has already banned plastic bags and polystyrene, but we can all still remember to #skipthestraw and stop using other single-use plastics to protect our lakes and bays!

Creating a Cleaner, Low-Carbon Transportation Future for NY

In Syracuse, we joined the discussion of potential policy approaches and strategies to bring about a cleaner and more resilient transportation future in New York. The NYSDEC, NYSERDA, and NYSDOT held regional stakeholder discussions to encourage conversations about clean transportation. We discussed the need to reduce climate change emissions, expand access to electric vehicles, and curb harmful air pollution from transportation.

Creating an Artificial Reef off the Coast of Hempstead, NY

CCE was pleased to join Governor Andrew Cuomo to witness the creation of an artificial reef in a 744-acre site off the south shore of Long Island. New York State is embarking on the largest artificial reef expansion in state history, expanding a total of 12 artificial reefs, which include two reefs in Long Island Sound, two in the Great South Bay, and eight in the Atlantic Ocean. The reef expansions are made out of recycled structures including rock, concrete, and steel, which settle to the sea floor and create new habitat for larger fish like blackfish, black seabass, cod, and summer flounder, as well as encrusting creatures like barnacles, sponges, anemones, corals, and mussels. We're excited to see how these recycled structures create habitats similar to natural reefs over time.

Suffolk County: Change Out Your Septic System

Over the summer and fall, we are hosting a series of forums highlighting the importance of reducing nitrogen pollution from outdated septic systems and cesspools. We will be helping residents secure grants to change out their old systems for new, on-site, nitrogen-reducing treatment systems through Suffolk County's Reclaim Our Water program. So far, we have held forums for Huntington and Riverhead residents and have received a great response. Our next forum is at Smithtown Library at 7pm on September 24, and we hope to see you there!

Improving Fish Habitat in the Carmans River

We were thrilled to participate in the signing of a Suffolk County resolution that will appropriate $1 million toward the completion of the Carmans River Fish Ladder Project, which will open up the last remaining barrier to fish passage on the Carmans River in Yaphank. As one of Long Island's Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers, the Carmans has long been a top destination for anglers. This project will open up approximately six miles of river and lake habitat for alewife, eels, and various trout species.

"The Health and Science of Our Bays: A Fire Island Perspective"

Thanks to everyone who came out to the Village of Saltaire for our "The Health and Science of Our Bays: A Fire Island Perspective" public forum. We were joined by environmental and governmental experts from the United States Geological Survey, Suffolk County Health Department, and The Nature Conservancy to discuss Fire Island's water quality challenges and solutions.

Environmentalists question safety of state’s weed-killing program

Environmentalists question safety of state’s weed-killing program

It is easy to see that the state Department of Transportation has finished up its annual half-million-dollar weed-spraying program for the summer.

You can tell by 3-foot-wide swaths of dried, brown vegetation along 5,000 miles of guardrails, sound barriers and center medians on Connecticut highways and secondary roads.

“The weeds, grass and vegetation grows back the next season,” said Adam Boone, who heads the DOT’s herbicide program. “It minimizes the manual labor needed to control growth.”

The DOT stresses that its crews are well-trained and the chemicals are safe, and the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection approves the method.

The environmental community, however, is not so sure about the safety.